A Report answers a question. An Assessment grades a subject — a property, a site, a route, a threat, a family's footprint, a company's exposure. Same method, pointed at a thing rather than a question: a measured baseline, a score you can argue with, and a plain ledger of what we confirmed and what we couldn't.
Tax and crime baselines, natural-hazard and major-accident perimeters parcel by parcel, terrain appreciation — slope, winter access, flood and fire approach, sightlines — and the zoning revision already in the public record.
Property & relocation — the three phases →Access geometry, approach and setback, what overlooks it, the surrounding baseline and the hours it changes. The picture a floor plan and an alarm contract can't give you.
The regional read, each fixed point assessed as a place in its own right, a graded primary route with a genuinely independent alternate — and the crisis geography around every leg: emergency spurs, safe havens, and medical facilities graded by what they can actually treat.
Travel & route — the three layers →Intent, capability, and targeting logic assessed separately, then read together — so you know whether a threat is aimed at you, at your category, or at nobody in particular.
The footprint an adversary would assemble from open sources — addresses, affiliations, routines — plus pattern of life: where a family's rhythm is predictable, where it can be observed, and which chokepoint closes every option at once.
Pattern of life, after a move →Sites, key people, counterparties, and the dependencies behind them — where concentration risk sits and which single points would take the rest down with them.
Not on the list? Ask. The method is subject-agnostic — if it has a baseline and sources, it can be graded honestly. If it can't, we'll tell you that instead.
Route and site assessments carry a crisis layer as standard. The point isn't to predict the bad day — it's that on the bad day nobody is reading a map for the first time, and nobody is discovering that the nearest hospital can't take a trauma case.
Not the nearest hospital pin. Facilities are graded by tier — and where trauma capability can't be verified from open sources, it's marked unverified rather than assumed. That line has saved more plans than a confident one ever would.
Police, military, and diplomatic posts assessed as havens, with a pre-staged route from each point of the journey to the nearest one — worked out before it's needed, not during.
For each trigger — a blocked leg, an unusable chokepoint, a compromised venue — a ranked set of options, computed in advance. Triggers are fact patterns, never probabilities.
What a possible course of action actually is — the method, the gates, and what it can't do →
These are computed before departure and delivered as part of the package. Resolving them on target — the picture updating as a journey runs, and someone acting on it — is a GSOC, a separate product still in build. We'll say where it stands before you plan around it, rather than let an assessment imply cover it can't give.
Baseline. What is normal for this subject — measured, not assumed. Nothing can be graded without it.
Grade. Each element scored with the reasoning attached, so you can argue with the score rather than accept it.
Red-team. The case that we've mis-graded it, argued before you see the result.
Ledger. What's confirmed, what's inferred, and what needs ground truth — never blended together.
A property, a site, a route, a threat, one person's footprint — assessed once, delivered with its baseline and its gaps.
A journey is sites plus routes; a relocation is a property plus a commune plus a commute. Assessed as one picture rather than stapled reports.
A family, an organisation, a portfolio of sites — the full picture, with concentration risk and single points of failure named.
An assessment is a point in time. When the subject matters continuously — a site you operate, a family you're responsible for — it becomes the baseline for Aegilo Monitoring →
A graded picture is only worth what its sources are worth. The Brief applies the same source handling in public every week, where anyone can check it. seventeen editions are published and dated, each naming its sources and recording what changed since the last one. Read one before you write to us.
A Brief edition shows the method, not the deliverable — it is a weekly watch, not a client report. For a sample of the report itself, ask: we send one with the reply.
Most firms treat this as a legal appendix. For an intelligence firm it's part of the product: the question you asked us is itself confidential, before any answer exists.
Free first: The Location Dossier — thirteen checks you can run yourself.
A property, a site, a route, a threat, a family's footprint, a company's exposure — tell us the subject and we'll scope the grading before any work starts.
→ A graded picture with the reasoning attached→ An explicit confirmed / unconfirmed ledger→ A scope, turnaround and price agreed before we start